Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorOtieno, P.
dc.contributor.authorAgyemang, C.
dc.contributor.authorWami, W.
dc.contributor.authorWilunda, C.
dc.contributor.authorSanya, R. E.
dc.contributor.authorAsiki, G.
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-25T08:41:43Z
dc.date.available2024-06-25T08:41:43Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10275139/
dc.identifier.urihttps://globalheartjournal.com/articles/10.5334/gh.1213
dc.identifier.uri10.5334/gh.1213
dc.identifier.urihttp://knowhub.aphrc.org/handle/123456789/1065
dc.description.abstractIntegrated chronic disease management is the desired core function of a responsive healthcare system. However, many challenges surround its implementation in Sub-Saharan Africa. The current study assessed the readiness of healthcare facilities to provide integrated management of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) and type 2 diabetes in Kenya.We used data from a nationally representative cross-sectional survey of 258 public and private health facilities conducted in Kenya between 2019 and 2020. Data were collected using a standardised facility assessment questionnaire and observation checklists modified from the World Health Organization Package of Essential Non-communicable Diseases. The primary outcome was the readiness to provide integrated care for CVDs and diabetes-defined as the mean availability of tracer items comprising trained staff and clinical guidelines, diagnostic equipment, essential medicines, diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. A cut-off threshold of ≥70% was used to classify facilities as 'ready'. Gardner-Altman plots and modified Poisson regression were used to examine the facility characteristics associated with care integration readiness. Of the surveyed facilities, only a quarter (24.1%) were ready to provide integrated care for CVDs and type 2 diabetes. Care integration readiness was lower in public versus private facilities [aPR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.4 to 0.9], and primary healthcare facilities were less likely to be ready compared to hospitals [aPR = 0.2; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.4]. Facilities located in Central Kenya [aPR = 0.3; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.9], and the Rift Valley region [aPR = 0.4; 95% CI 0.1 to 0.9], were less likely to be ready compared to the capital Nairobi.
dc.publisherPubMed Central
dc.publisherGlobal Heart Journal
dc.subjectCardiovascular Diseases
dc.subjectType 2 Diabetes
dc.subjectIntegrated Care
dc.subjectFacility Readiness
dc.subjectKenya
dc.titleAssessing the Readiness to Provide Integrated Management of Cardiovascular Diseases and Type 2 Diabetes in Kenya: Results From a National Survey


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record