• English
    • français
    • Swahili
  • Swahili 
    • English
    • français
    • Swahili
  • Ingia ndani
Advanced Search
Help Guide
Kioneshe 
  •   DSpace Mwanzo
  • Publications
  • Published Paper
  • Data Synergy and Evaluation
  • 2024
  • Kioneshe
  •   DSpace Mwanzo
  • Publications
  • Published Paper
  • Data Synergy and Evaluation
  • 2024
  • Kioneshe
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Sudan Virus Disease Super- Spreading, Uganda, 2022

Thumbnail
Tarehe
2024
Mwandishi
Izudi, J.
Komakech, A., et al.
Metadata
Show full item record
Usage Stats
0
views
0
downloads

Kwa ufupi
On 20 September 2022, Uganda declared its fifth Sudan virus disease (SVD) outbreak, culminating in 142 confirmed and 22 probable cases. The reproductive rate (R) of this outbreak was 1.25. We described persons who were exposed to the virus, became infected, and they led to the infection of an unusually high number of cases during the outbreak. In this descriptive cross-sectional study, we defined a super-spreader person (SSP) as any person with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) confirmed SVD linked to the infection of ??13 other persons (10-fold the outbreak R). We reviewed illness narratives for SSPs collected through interviews. Whole-genome sequencing was used to support epidemiologic linkages between cases. Two SSPs (Patient A, a 33-year-old male, and Patient B, a 26-year-old male) were identified, and linked to the infection of one probable and 50 confirmed secondary cases. Both SSPs lived in the same parish and were likely infected by a single ill healthcare worker in early October while receiving healthcare. Both sought treatment at multiple health facilities, but neither was ever isolated at an Ebola Treatment Unit (ETU). In total, 18 secondary cases (17 confirmed, one probable), including three deaths (17%), were linked to Patient A; 33 secondary cases (all confirmed), including 14 (42%) deaths, were linked to Patient B. Secondary cases linked to Patient A included family members, neighbours, and contacts at health facilities, including healthcare workers. Those linked to Patient B included healthcare workers, friends, and family members who interacted with him throughout his illness, prayed over him while he was nearing death, or exhumed his body. Intensive community engagement and awareness-building were initiated based on narratives collected about patients A and B; 49 (96%) of the secondary cases were isolated in an ETU, a median of three days after onset. Only nine tertiary cases were linked to the 51 secondary cases. Sequencing suggested plausible direct transmission from the SSPs to 37 of 39 secondary cases with sequence data.
Somo
Sudan Virus Disease; Ebola; Outbreak; Uganda
URI
10.1186/s12879-024-09391-0
https://bmcinfectdis.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12879-024-09391-0
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/376937815_Sudan_virus_disease_super-spreading_Uganda_2022
http://knowhub.aphrc.org/handle/123456789/1502
Collections
  • 2024 [4]

KnowHub software copyright © 2002-2022  LYRASIS
Wasiliana nasi | Tuma maoni
Theme by 
Atmire NV
 

 

Peruzi

Dspesi yoteJumuhia na VifunguTarehe ya tukioMwandishi wa kitabuJina la kitabuSomoKifungu hikiTarehe ya tukioMwandishi wa kitabuJina la kitabuSomo

My Account

KuingiaSajili

KnowHub software copyright © 2002-2022  LYRASIS
Wasiliana nasi | Tuma maoni
Theme by 
Atmire NV