Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAkter, F.
dc.contributor.authorBanze, N.
dc.contributor.authorCapitine, I.
dc.contributor.authorSimiyu, S.
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-28T06:34:46Z
dc.date.available2025-07-28T06:34:46Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1038/s44221-025-00434-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://knowhub.aphrc.org/handle/123456789/2460
dc.description.abstractSustainable Development Goal�6.2 measures sanitation progress by toilet type. However, improving people�s subjective sanitation experiences�such as feeling safe, avoiding disgust, maintaining privacy, reducing shame, and perceiving lower disease risk�is often overlooked. The SanQoL?5 index aggregates responses to five questions on these themes into a single 0�1 score. We evaluated its validity and reliability by surveying 6,165 individuals in rural and urban settings across six countries (Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia). There was strong construct validity: 87% of predicted associations between SanQoL?5 scores and toilet quality met expectations (P?<?0.05). Cross-cultural comparability was supported: only 9% of comparisons showed meaningful item bias across countries. Item-response theory models confirmed its structure, and convergent, discriminant, and known-groups validity were established. Overall, SanQoL?5 is a robust tool for sanitation impact evaluation, monitoring, needs assessment, and cost�benefit analysis.
dc.publisherNature
dc.subjectSubjective Sanitation Experience Measurement II Psychometric Evaluation & Validity Testing II Cross-Cultural Instrument Reliability II Sanitation Quality of Life Index (SanQoL?5) II SDG 6.2 Monitoring Tools II WASH Impact & Economic Evaluation
dc.titleValidity and Reliability of the Sanitation-related Quality of Life Index (sanqol-5) in Six Countries


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record