dc.contributor.author | Wao, H. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wao, M. A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Muriithi, I. | |
dc.contributor.author | Seraii, P. | |
dc.contributor.author | Syonguvi, J. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-07-12T05:36:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-07-12T05:36:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.identifier.uri | 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059991 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35705341/ | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.researchgate.net/publication/361336308_Availability_accessibility_and_activation_of_mental_health_services_among_university_students_in_Africa_a_protocol_of_a_mixed-methods_systematic_review_with_meta-analysis_and_meta-synthesis | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://knowhub.aphrc.org/handle/123456789/1274 | |
dc.description.abstract | Introduction: In Africa, the prevalence of mental health problems is higher among university students than in the general population. A number of systematic reviews and recent prevalence studies have focused on prevalence of mental health issues among college. This mixed-methods systematic review, including meta-analysis and meta-synthesis, will explore: what mental health services are available to university students; the extent to which students access available services and factors associated with service access; and the degree to which students activate (use) accessible services and factors associated with service activation.
Methods and analysis: We will conduct electronic literature search of the following databases: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Semantic Scholar, ERIC, Trip Database, Medline and PsycINFO. Disagreement, if any, will be resolved by a third reviewer. Two reviewers will independently assess the methodological quality of included studies using relevant tools. For cross-sectional studies, we will use the Joanna Briggs Institute Checklist for Analytical Cross Sectional Studies whereas qualitative or mixed-methods studies will be assessed using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. OR, risk ratio or mean difference with 95% CI will be considered as the effect size. We will assess heterogeneity between studies by appropriate subgroup analyses. Publication bias will be detected using funnel plots.
Ethics and dissemination: Ethical clearance is not required as we are not collecting primary data. Findings will be disseminated via relevant scientific conferences and peer-reviewed publications. | |
dc.publisher | National Library of Medicine | |
dc.publisher | ResearchGate | |
dc.subject | Adult psychiatry | |
dc.subject | Mental Health | |
dc.subject | Psychiatry | |
dc.title | Availability, Accessibility, and Activation of Mental Health Services Among University Students in Africa: A Protocol of a Mixed Methods Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis and Meta-Synthesis | |