Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWawire, B.
dc.contributor.authorStory-Barnes, A.
dc.contributor.authorKiru, E.
dc.contributor.authorKim,S.
dc.date.accessioned2024-06-25T07:33:43Z
dc.date.available2024-06-25T07:33:43Z
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.urihttps://journals.library.columbia.edu/index.php/cice/article/view/9969
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/373771378_Primary_school_learning_in_sub-Saharan_Africa_during_COVID-19_a_scoping_review_of_responses_and_recovery_initiatives_induced
dc.identifier.uri10.52214/cice.v25i1.9969
dc.identifier.urihttp://knowhub.aphrc.org/handle/123456789/1028
dc.description.abstractGlobally, the COVID-19 pandemic caused unprecedented disruptions in education.School closures quickly followed the onset of the pandemic to contain the spread of the virus, forcing millions of students out of their regular academic calendars. Countries putin place interventions aimed to reduce the deleterious effects of school closures and disruptions in learning. For instance, many countries used various mediums to provide students with distance learning. This scoping review examines the interventions that education systems in low- and middle-income Sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries (LMIC) implemented to mitigate learning loss in reading and writing skills among early grade learners (i.e., children attending primary schools) and discusses the reach of those programs. This review highlights the proportion of students reached by the targeted mitigation measures, revealing that LMIC countries in SSA provided students with remote learning opportunities through radio and television programming, provided teachers with professional development on the use of novel tools, and provided parents and families with support to help learners at home. However, these disruptions affected the traditional assessment methods. Various assessment methods were implemented to measure student progress, but there is a need for appropriate progress monitoring tools and accurate data to measure the effectiveness of the interventions. Many LMIC implemented Return-to-School policy frameworks, processes, and principles that ensured safe learning continuity.
dc.publisherColumbia Library Journals
dc.publisherResearchGate
dc.subjectPrimary school learning
dc.subjectCOVID-19
dc.subjectResponses
dc.subjectRecovery initiatives
dc.subjectRemote learning opportunities
dc.subjectAssessment methods
dc.subjectSub-Saharan Africa
dc.titlePrimary School Learning in Sub-Saharan Africa During COVID-19: A Scoping Review of Responses and Recovery Initiatives Induced


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record