The interplay of top-down and bottom-up strategies to improve learning outcomes.

dc.contributor.authorAbuya, B.A.
dc.date.accessioned2024-01-31T07:33:54Z
dc.date.available2024-01-31T07:33:54Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.description.abstractTop-down, bottom-up, and incremental approaches are usually applied to the implementation of policies (DarlingHammond, 2000). Top-down strategies refer to a more linear, unitary and rational process where decisions are from the top, sometimes made by those at the head of institutions, while the bottom-up approach is relatively communicative and emanates from those who are the likely recipients of the policies or decisions, and are often those closest to the implementation process and have the greatest bearing to the outcomes of policies or programs (Darling-Hammond, 1990; Haddad & Demsky, 1995). Even though these approaches have been solely applied to the policy process, they can also explain implementation mechanisms within education programs that have expansive in nature and seeks to influence policy outcomes in a particular educational skill area—learning outcomes.
dc.identifier.urihttps://aphrc.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/RELI-brief-implementation-of-policies.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://knowhub.aphrc.org/handle/123456789/633
dc.publisherAPHRC
dc.subjectEducation and Youth Empowerment
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectSecondary Eductaion
dc.subjectRELI
dc.subjectSDG
dc.subjectA LOT Change
dc.subjectTeacher Cantered Learning
dc.titleThe interplay of top-down and bottom-up strategies to improve learning outcomes.
dc.typePolicy Brief

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Equity and inclusion Towards an accelerated action to enhance learning in East Africa Briefing Paper Nairobi APHRC.pdf
Size:
1.96 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections