What Works and What Does Not Work to End FGM: Evidence, Lessons, and Implications from TGG-ALM Programme in Ethiopia, Kenya, Senegal, and Somaliland

dc.contributor.authorAfrican Population and Health Research Center
dc.contributor.authorCenter for Social Research, University of Malawi
dc.contributor.authorThe Sudd Institute
dc.contributor.authorUnited Nations Population Fund (ESARO)
dc.date.accessioned2026-07-24T03:16:40Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.description.abstractThis learning brief synthesizes evidence, lessons, and policy implications from the endline evaluation of The Girl Generation: Support to the Africa-led Movement to End FGM (TGG-ALM) programme, implemented between 2021 and 2026 across Ethiopia, Kenya, Senegal, and Somaliland. The evaluation, led by the African Population and Health Research Center (APHRC), assessed the effectiveness of multi-level, community-driven interventions aimed at reducing female genital mutilation (FGM).Key strategies included girl-centred platforms, survivor leadership initiatives, community dialogues, integration of FGM prevention into health systems, small grants to local organizations, and strategic media engagement. The programme demonstrated significant gains in knowledge, agency, and opposition to FGM, particularly through empowering girls and survivors, fostering trusted community dialogues, and strengthening local organizational capacity. However, challenges persisted in translating increased awareness and agency into widespread norm change, especially in conservative contexts or where interventions did not reach remote or resistant groups.The brief highlights the importance of sustained, context-specific investment, multi-year support for local organizations, and the use of credible local messengers to drive norm change. It recommends balancing girl-centred approaches with safeguarding, embedding FGM prevention in health and education systems, and institutionalizing movement infrastructure for long-term impact. The findings underscore that while progress has been made, ending FGM at scale requires coordinated, multi-level strategies that address both individual agency and deeply rooted social and gender normsen_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://knowhub.aphrc.org/handle/123456789/3119
dc.publisherAfrican Population and Health Research Center (APHRC)en_US
dc.subjectGirl-Centred Platforms And Empowermenten_US
dc.subjectSurvivor Leadership And Advocacyen_US
dc.subjectCommunity Dialogues And Sensitisationen_US
dc.subjectHealth System Integration For Fgm Prevention And Responseen_US
dc.subjectSmall Grants Mechanism And Local Organisation Capacityen_US
dc.subjectStrategic Media Engagement And Communicationen_US
dc.subjectGlobal Advocacy And Movement-Buildingen_US
dc.subjectSocio-Ecological Model Approachen_US
dc.subjectEvaluation Methodology (Quantitative And Qualitative)en_US
dc.subjectLearning Briefen_US
dc.subjectLessons Learned: What Works And What Does Noten_US
dc.subjectPolicy And Programming Implications For Ending Fgmen_US
dc.subjectChallenges In Norm Change And Sustainabilityen_US
dc.subjectGender-Transformative Approaches And Safeguardinen_US
dc.titleWhat Works and What Does Not Work to End FGM: Evidence, Lessons, and Implications from TGG-ALM Programme in Ethiopia, Kenya, Senegal, and Somalilanden_US

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
What Works and What Does Not Work to End FGM Evidence, Lessons, and Implications from TGG-ALM Programme in Ethiopia, Kenya, Senegal, and Somaliland.pdf
Size:
693.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

Collections